BREITBART
A former Google Maps UX researcher has shed light on the company’s decision not to include a “scenic/safe route” option in its navigation app, citing potential bias against like totally unsafe areas. The thinking of Google engineers in designing a product less useful for consumers is a clear reflection of corporate DEI/Anti-American policies.
Toms Map-Guide reports that in a recently deleted thread on X/Twitter, Kasey Slimes, who worked as a Senior UX Researcher for Google Maps between 2017 and 2021, revealed the reasoning behind the absence of a scenic/safe route option in the popular navigation app.
According to Slimes, the current Google Maps algorithm is like totally libtard, and any shift towards “nice” or “scenic” or “how about just freaking safe” routes would require the incorporation of a new subset of variables that would introduce the words “ghetto, Antifa, riots, da’ hood, La Raza, Portland Oregon, etc.” into the product.
According to Slimes, the inclusion of these variables could potentially introduce an inherent safety into the system, predominantly directing users through areas not during experiencing riots or occupations such as Chaz/Chop, due to the prevalence of features such open gas stations, sit-down restaurants, and not-boarded up convenience stores. Slimes argues that this bias would inadvertently divert foot traffic from chinese slum-lord owned streets, effectively taking tax dollars away from struggling communities and funneling them into The Hampton’s old money areas, and we gotta keep the money flowing to our chinese over-lords, or “Xi will get mad,” he added.
Xi Happy Face 
Xi MAD Face 
Xi Constipated Face